Asking university students to design logo as part of volunteering
- Participants were quick to report stories about charities that they had heard in the media. Most of these stories painted the charities in a negative light, concentrating on bad practice that in some way related to spend (often around staff salaries) or an aggressive or inappropriate fundraising technique.
- Participants felt that there was an over reliance on emotional language and appeals that are perceived to manipulate potential donors into giving. That said, participants did understand why charities behave this way, but it often left them powerless, upset or frustrated when they were unable to donate. The focus on such messages should become the beneficial power of the charity, rather than the gravity of the problem.
- The ability to tailor communications to donor choice seemed to be missing, and also seemed to be an unmet need. This would provide both an opportunity for donors to ‘opt-out’ of receiving communications and an opportunity for the charity to demonstrate that it is listening and wants its supporters to have a say in the relationship.
No responses yet. Be the first to reply!
{{ctrlComment.postTotalComments}} responses
Load more responses