Part of running an SCIO is that trustees have collective responsibility and decisions are made by the majority.

Case 1) A trustee is responsible for the running of clubs. A new coach to run a club is recruited. Recruitment is done following an undocumented but repeatable process. One other trustee has some input. The coach is paid £20/week as a self-employed contractor, the club makes a profit. The other trustees have no interest in details bar clubs running without significant issues. If questioned by the board, a decision trail could be made showing transparency of the recruitment decision.  

Question: should the final recruitment decision be made unilaterally by the clubs trustee or by the majority of trustees?

Case 2) The treasurer reports three high level figures for the clubs operations for the year to date; total of fees raised, total of coaches invoices, total of general clubs running expenses. When the clubs trustee asks the treasurer later for a breakdown of the figures they are told that the high level figures are sufficient. 

Question: Is the treasurer's unilateral decision to restrict access valid or should it have been a majority decision by the trustees?